US DUI Match? : The USA has one of the worst DUI driving accident rates in the developed world while having lower to mid-range rates of alcohol consumption.
Richardson Law Offices, LLC is a law firm located in the heart of Alabama. We provide legal services throughout the entire state of Alabama.
Our firm is a general law practice that is focused on the areas of personal injury, criminal representation, domestic relations, and corporate representation. Our firm works hard to provide each client results through affordable legal services.
If you face any of the following questions, and you need Alabama legal solutions, review our site and contact our firm for a consultation.
DUI
& Driving Under The Influence: Driving Under the Influence : Driving while consuming alcohol is generally illegal, though driving after drinking remains legal. In some jurisdictions it is also illegal for an open container of an alcoholic beverage to be in the passenger compartment of a motor vehicle or in some specific area of that compartment. DUI Meaning : The specific criminal offense may be called, depending on the jurisdiction, driving while intoxicated (DWI), driving while impaired (also DWI), operating while intoxicated (OWI), operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OMVI), driving under the influence [of alcohol or other drugs] (DUI), driving under the combined influence of alcohol and/or other drugs, driving under the influence per se or drunk in charge [of a vehicle]. Such laws may also apply to boating, piloting aircraft, and even bicycling in some states such as California.
*
No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed
is greater than the quality
of legal services performed by other lawyers. The information presented
at this site should
not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client
relationship.
DUI Driving Drunk : But the law was changed and changed again - strengthened, in fact, to be less tolerant of multiple convictions. But a provision that stipulated four convictions in five years was inadvertently left in. The high court indicated that it had little choice. It could not consider seven convictions in 15 years as constituting four in five years.